英译学术论文摘要【四十二】

按：二十余年来，业余翻译或校对哲学、社会科学等人文学术期刊和师友论文摘要，至今已经译校不少篇什。它们或长或短，或深奥艰涩，或浅显易懂，却都是经过一番努力，数度推敲，几经润色定稿的。不过，最初几年的译校系手写，故均已散佚。1996年换笔改用电脑后虽然数次更换机器，多次重装或升级系统，其中偶然也有丢失，但绝大多数仍保存于硬盘。今特选择自认为比较忠实原文者，分批转帖，名之为《英译学术论文摘要》，以期方家哂正。下面是其四十二。——啮书轩主人启。

---------------------------

英译学术论文摘要【四十二】

I.           Merits and Demerits of Goodwill Misreading:

An Interpretation and Elucidation of the “Five Propositions”

in The Spring & Autumn Annals

善 意 误 读 的 弊 与 功

——对《春秋》“五例”的解读与阐发

Rather than as is used in terms of literary rhetoric and narration, the “Five Propositions” of The Spring & Autumn Annals are employed to express the author's appraisal of events and people through the subtle differences in naming so as to convey their political and ethical beliefs. In the course of its interpretation, researchers have failed to provide an in-depth examination into its line of reasoning, which has brought about inaccurate explanations. By a well-intentioned misinterpretation, Liu Xie not only endowed the “Five Propositions” with fresh meanings, but also established a brand-new theoretical category, “implicitness”, thus contributing to the formation and reinforcement of the national features of Chinese literary theory. There are substantial differences between Liu’s “Implicitness” and the “Obscurity” of the “Five Propositions”, as well as between Liu’s “Ambiguity” and “Insinuation” and the “Profound Meaning in an Obscure Utterance” in The Spring & Autumn Annals. To over-interpret its style of writing regardless of its literary features has produced negative effect and led to the eisegetical fact-searching criticism. The study of literary critical history therefore needs to distinguish explicitly the original meaning of the “Five Propositions” from the “Insinuation” that came about afterwards.

II.      Study on the Friendship Between Gui Fu and Zhou Yongnian

桂馥与周永年交游考述

Gui Fu was a distinguished scholar, paleographer, calligrapher, seal cutter and one of the four prestigious experts in the study of The Origin of Chinese Characters(Shuowen Jiezi) during the Qing Dynasty. For, he cherished an intense fondness for inscriptions on ancient bronzes and stone tablets, and had a very good command of both the seal and the official script while, as said above, he was well known for his research and textual criticism of The Origin of Chinese Characters. And on the basis of this, he made a lot of friends and had many acquaintances, and was in close association with scholars all over the country. Among them, Zhou Yongnian from Licheng County, Jinan Prefecture, was one of his bosom friends, with whom he was on the most intimate terms, and remained contact, for the longest time. The two of them learned from each other by exchanging views and comparing notes on knowledge. And, together, they planned and founded a book-lending garden (namely a library), and compiled the Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature. The friendship between them had lasted for nearly 30 years before Zhou passed away. In a word, the book-lending garden established by them two was of pioneering significance in the history of Chinese library.

.

III.       Study on the Deeds of Yuan Yue, Prince of Runan,

in the Northern Wei Dynasty and Relevant Issues

北魏汝南王元悦事迹及相关问题研究

Holding a very critical social and political status during the Northern Wei Dynasty, the imperial househol exerted an important impact upon the then political development. The deeds of Yuan Yue, youngest son of Emperoro Xiaowen, may be taken as a typical case. He was of an unruly personality, though, he was acquainted with Confucianism, Buddhism and necromancy to different degrees. And most of the offices appointed to him were crucial and respectable. However, this was in accordance with the general practice as far as nomination of the imperial clan was concerned. And most of his underlings employed in his fiefdom were from famous gentry pursuant to regulations. Yet the relationship between Yuan Yue and his underlings was not close enough. At the end of the Northern Wei Dynasty, he was suspected by Emperor Xiaowu due to his political ambition and his identity as one of the sons of Emperor Xiaowen, and this eventually resulted in his fatal disaster.

附：原文

一、善 意 误 读 的 弊 与 功

——对《春秋》“五例”的解读与阐发

《春秋》五例，本来是以命名的细微差异表示对事件和人物的褒贬，达到宣示作者政治伦理信仰的目的，并不是就文学的修辞和叙事而言。历来论者对五例立论指向未予细辨，诠释多欠精确。刘勰通过对五例善意的误读，赋予了新的含义，并创建了全新的文论范畴“隐”，推进了中国文论民族特色的形成和强化。刘勰所说的“隐”与五例中的“微”，他说的“复意”、“重旨”与《春秋》的微言大义，有性质的区别。离开文学的特性对春秋书法过度诠释，产生了消极影响，导致穿凿附会的索隐批评，是不可取的。文学批评史研究，应将本来意义的五例，与后来的“重旨”之说明确区别。

二．桂馥与周永年交游考述

桂馥是清代著名学者、文字学家、书法家、篆刻家，《说文》四大家之一。他嗜好金石，精于篆隶，善治《说文》，并以此为基础，广交天下学人。其中相交久、相知厚者之一，为济南历城周永年。二人切磋问学，一起创办借书园，一起纂修《四库全书》，相识相交近30年，直至周永年辞世。他们共同筹办的借书园，在中国图书馆史上具有开创性意义。 

三、北魏汝南王元悦事迹及相关问题研究

北魏皇族宗室在社会政治上占据重要位置，对北魏政治发展起到了重要影响，元悦可为较为典型之个案。元悦性致狂逸，对于儒学、佛教以及方术都有不同程度的接触。元悦所历官职大多崇重，也符合元魏宗室任职的一般特点。元悦依制开设官府所荐用的僚佐大多出自名门士族，但僚佐与府主之间的结合关系较为疏散。在北魏末年，元悦本身的政治野心和孝文帝之子的这一身分引起孝武帝的疑忌，遂引来杀身之祸。